Popular Posts
-
This is a shout out to the one and only Bryan Welnetz, blog creeper extraordinaire. Why you were creepin on my English 15 homework is beyond...
-
In my trash can sits the remnants of a makeshift college vacuum- lint roller sheets. They’re normally used for pet hair, but not in this cas...
-
Non-abstinence programs are more effective for sex education because they are more relative to this day in age, it allows those being educat...
-
A lot of high schools back home, not including mine, are only required to write one research paper throughout the four years of mandatory E...
-
Good: By changing after school athletics to intramural, the school board will save money. Teams won't need to get to other schools in or...
-
In the broadcast “#1 Party school” the writer defines the issue very well. They start off with evidence right away, and I thought that was a...
-
I really enjoyed reading “A Modest Proposal”. This piece was very effective as a proposal because it took into consideration its audience, ...
-
I’m evaluating the Twilight series in both movie form and book form. This series has been a popular set of novels among teens in the past fe...
-
“Shirt-Worthy”. I particularly liked this memoir because I felt like the writer chose an unexpected topic, an experience that didn’t seem th...
-
This year, being my first State Patty's Day, had high expectations. I had read over and over again in the Daily Collegian about how they...
Sunday, March 27, 2011
Questions from class 3/25
Journal Ten
I really enjoyed reading “A Modest Proposal”. This piece was very effective as a proposal because it took into consideration its audience, it had a clear thesis, it had points that supported the thesis, and it had a rebuttal argument. This piece is structured in paragraphs that are separated by the points Swift uses to explain why children should be eaten. I liked how he uses very specific points that include ages of children, as well as what those certain ages stand for. I also liked how he placed his rebuttal argument right at the end, so after reading lots of reasons why we should believe him, we got the opposite side of the argument. He proved it wrong, which was laughable for me because the whole piece was a satire anyway. I found it funny that he was arguing against what, in a real argument paper, would be a good reason.
The points he uses are that we should fatten our kids up in order to eat them. He even goes as far as to mention that at a certain point of the child’s life they taste the best. Swift also says that eating babies would be effective because it would reduce the population and it would be better to eat babies because elderly people are just going to die anyway.
I think the satirical tone of this piece is meant to be something like the present day “Tina Fey-like” shows, or something like Saturday Night Live.